The Battle for Our Minds Has Already Begun

0 9

There are battlefields in Syria, Ukraine, Yemen, and elsewhere, however given the state of company media, maybe probably the most consequential battle now being fought is for our minds.

(CN Op-ed) — After studying The New York Occasions piece “The Plot to Subvert an Election” I put the paper down with a single query.

Why, after two years of allegations, indictments, and claims to proof of this, that, and the opposite did the newspaper of file—nicely, as soon as the newspaper of file—see any must publish such a bit? My reply is straightforward: The orthodox account of Russia-gate has not taken maintain: It has failed in its effort to determine a consensus of certainty amongst People. My conclusion matches this commentary: The orthodox narrative is rarely going to attain this goal. There are too many holes in it.

“The data age is definitely a media age,” John Pilger, the famous British–Australian journalist, remarked throughout a symposium 4 years in the past, when the Ukraine disaster was at its peak. “We’ve got conflict by media; censorship by media; demonology by media; retribution by media; diversion by media—a surreal meeting line of obedient clichés and false assumptions.” Pilger revisited the theme in a piece final week on Consortium Information, arguing that once-tolerated, dissenting opinion has lately “regressed right into a metaphoric underground.”

There are battlefields in Syria, Ukraine, Yemen, and elsewhere, however maybe probably the most consequential battle now being fought is for our minds.

Those that dispense with sincere mental inquiry, wholesome skepticism of all media, and an insistence that assertions require supporting proof shouldn’t win this conflict. The Occasions piece by Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti—two of the paper’s top-tier reporters—is a living proof: If the Russia-gate narrative had been so broadly accepted as their report purports, there would have been no must publish such a bit at this late date.

Many orthodox narratives are broadly accepted nonetheless amongst a public that’s not at all times paying consideration. The general public too usually participates within the manufactured consent. Often it take years for the reality to be broadly understood. Typically it comes when the U.S. admits it a long time later, such because the position of the CIA within the coups in Iran and Chile. Different occasions it comes by way of admissions by former U.S. officers, similar to former Protection Secretary Robert McNamara in regards to the Vietnam Conflict.

Even Latest Narratives are Fraying

There are more moderen examples of official narratives rapidly fraying if not beginning to disintegrate, although Institution media continues to push them.

As an example, there are severe doubts about who was chargeable for alleged chemical weapons assaults in Syria. Essentially the most important was in Japanese Ghouta in August 2013 adopted by assaults in Khan Sheikhoun (April 2017) and Douma (April 2018).

US Marines Conduct Main Army Drills With Rebels in Southern Syria

The company media accounts of every of those assaults have been countered with persuasive proof towards the prevailing view that the federal government of Bashar al–Assad was responsible. It has been supplied journalists (Seymour Hersh ), a scientist (Theodore Postol ), and on-the-ground correspondents and native witnesses. These stories are topic to additional verification. However in no way do official narratives stand with out problem.

There may be additionally the case of Malaysian Flight MH–17, shot down over Ukrainian territory in June 2014. The official report, issued a 12 months later, concluded that the aircraft was downed by Ukrainian rebels utilizing a Russian-supplied missile. The report was defective from the primary: Investigators never visited the site , some proof was primarily based on a report produced by Bellingcat , an open-source web page affiliated with the vigorously anti–Russian Atlantic Council, and Ukraine was given the precise to approve the report earlier than it was issued.

Final week the Russian army disclosed evidence that serial numbers discovered within the particles on the MH–17 crash website point out the missile that downed the aircraft was produced at a Soviet military-production plant in 1986 owned by Ukraine. Allow us to see additional verification of this proof (though I severely doubt any Western correspondent will search any). The official report of 2015 famous the serial numbers, so we all know they’re genuine, however it didn’t use them to hint the missile’s provenance.

There may be additionally the severely muddled case of the poisoning of the Skripals in Britain.  Why hasn’t the Western media dug into this story somewhat than settle for at face worth the pronouncements of the British authorities?

A month in the past I lamented the harm Russia-gate has achieved to lots of our most essential establishments, the press not least amongst them. What’s the company media considering? That when President Trump is dumped, all will return to regular requirements will likely be restored? One may argue the reverse: that adversarial journalism has returned to the White Home beat largely out of private animus in the direction of Trump and that it’s going to disappear once more as soon as a extra “regular” president is in workplace.

As Pilger put it, “It is a seismic shift, with journalists policing the brand new ‘groupthink,’ as [Robert] Parry referred to as it, allotting myths and distractions, pursuing its enemies.”

In different phrases, Institution journalism has shifted far afield from its conventional beliefs of non-partisan, goal reporting and is as an alternative vying on your thoughts to enlist it in its agenda to advertise American pursuits overseas or one get together or the opposite at dwelling.

We are able to’t allow them to get away with it. Our minds are our personal.